For 4 weeks receive unlimited Premium digital access to the FT's trusted, award-winning business news. Digital Be informed with the essential news and opinion. Delivery to your home or office Monday to Saturday FT Weekend paper — a stimulating blend of news and lifestyle features ePaper access — the digital replica of the printed newspaper.
Team or Enterprise Premium FT. Pay based on use. Does my organisation subscribe? Proliferation is expected to continue, not least because Russia and India are running behind. Predator drones had already observed Osama bin Laden, the al-Qaida leader, from the skies. But the first strike, in October , missed its intended target, Taliban leader Mullah Omar.
But this failure did not deter the US. British statistics give some idea of the frequency of contemporary drone strikes the US does not release equivalent data.
In four years of war against Isis in Iraq and Syria from , Reaper drones were deployed on more than 2, missions — almost two a day. RAF Reaper drones are piloted from RAF Waddington in Lincolnshire and by UK personnel from Creech air force base in Nevada, where crews operate in three-hour shifts, although the drones themselves are based in the Middle East, almost certainly at an air base in Kuwait. Pilots on rotation control devices that are able to loiter in a conflict zone for about 16 to 20 hours — and able in theory to hit a target the size of a household pane of glass.
Drone usage consistently tests legal norms. For the US, such drone strikes have become commonplace. The practice began under George W Bush, was expanded under Barack Obama and appears to have increased further still under Donald Trump, although in March he made analysis harder by signing an executive order banning reporting of drone casualty details.
Congress should fully investigate the long-term impacts of drone warfare. We as a country must ask ourselves some serious questions. Aside from the moral issues raised by drone use, there are real questions about their impact on the future of U. What has been the impact of drones on U.
Has the drone program actually been effective at countering terrorism? What happens when the United States no longer dominates over this technology?
What can be done to prevent non-state armed groups from acquiring drones? The United States, together with the international community, must recognize these challenges and begin to outline restrictions and accountability for drone use. Restraining the use of drones worldwide is undoubtedly in the best interest of a more just and peaceful world. Wars and Militarism Voting and Elections. Email Address Sign Up.
Home Background. What are drones? Cost Targets Congress Administration Implications. Drone pilots — humans operating the weapons remotely — wait for a target to appear then launch a missile. In Iraq, more than 13, civilians have been killed in coalition drone strikes since they resumed in , when Islamic State IS captured areas of Iraq they had ceased three years earlier with the withdrawal of US and UK troops. By August 1 , in 1, days of 14, coalition drone strikes in Iraq and 19, in Syria, up to 13, civilians had been killed , of which 2, were children.
Figures from the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan show the number of civilian casualties from US drone strikes rose from in the first half of to in the same period in In drone strikes, the aim is to kill not capture. Human beings are denied the right to surrender and are instead executed for being members of a group defined by the killers as evil.
Drones are thought to appear in a sticky situation to swiftly reward the just and punish the unjust. Targeted killing becomes normalised, leading to increasing human rights abuses.
0コメント